Saturday 28 December 2013

Task week 3 & Reflection


(a)   Identify the theory behind communicative language teaching approach.

Based on the article of Communicative Language Teaching by Nina Spada, CLT is an approach to L2 teaching where it is a meaning-based and learner-centered approach. Here, the fluency is being emphasized more compared to the accuracy of the language or in other words, it is mainly focus on the ability of the students to understand and produce messages and not the teaching or correction of language form. Other than that, there is also other view that purpose CLT as primarily meaning-based which includes both the fluency and accuracy aspect.

The audio-lingual method is an oral-based approach which is based on the behavioral psychology (Skinner). In addition, it is used in the language learning where it gives attention on the inductive learning of grammar. The learning is conducted through the activities that involve the students to do repetition, practice and memorization. This method will drill the students in the use of grammatical sentence patterns. For example, dialogue activities which can be carried out by the students in form of imitation and repetition. By conducting this activity, the students will be able to use the target language communicatively.

Furthermore, according to Hymes’ theory the knowledge of the rules of grammar (linguistic competence) and the knowledge of the rules of language use (communicative competence) gives obvious impact on CLT. According to Hymes’, the focus in L2 teaching is through the accurate use of grammatical forms. Besides that, there are also several components of abilitiesthat the learners need to require which is(1) linguistic competence; (2) sociolinguistic competence; (3) discourse competence; and (4) Strategic competence.

·         Linguistic competence: the knowledge of grammar and vocabulary.
·         Sociolinguistic competence: the ability to say the appropriate thing in a certain social situation.
·         Discourse competence: the ability to start, enter, contribute to, and end a conversation, and the ability to do this in a consistent and coherent manner.
·         Strategic competence: the ability to communicative effectively and repair problems caused by communication breakdown.


(b) State the implications of communicative language teaching towards materials development.

Implication 1:- Functional categories found in teaching materials which includes making requests, greeting, making suggestion enable the learners to be aware of communicative functions. It also helps the learners to understand the fact that communication could break down if they only focus on linguistic (semantic-grammatical) meaning and ignore the intended use of the utterance (i.e. function) by the speaker. For instance, a person whom struggling to open the door due to heavy luggage asks a random student for a help gives grammatically correct answer, without taking any action, may cause offense as the answer shows lack of the understanding of the embedded function of ‘making a request’. Traditional teaching materials tend to simplify the complex form function relationship into one-to-one correspondence. The interrogatives are used for asking questions, imperatives for giving commands and conditionals for making hypothetical statements. From a communicative perspective, this relationship is explored more carefully, and as a result our views on the properties of language have been expanded and enriched. However, there are number of pedagogic problems associated with this approach to materials design, particularly to do with the sequencing of the language to be practised.

Implication 2:-
The real world language in use does not operate in a vacuum.  We need to aware that the language function and language form does not operate in isolation but as part of as network of interconnected factors, all of which need to be taken into account in materials that use a communicative concept as their design principle. Based on a large amount of data from spoken language known as a corpus, Carter et al (2011) and O’ Keeffe et al (2007)explain how spoken grammar is distinctly different from written grammar. There are also principles of conversation (McCarten and McCarthy, 2010) in which social interactions play an important role. There is often a stated requirement for authenticity- a term that loosely implies as close an approximation as possible an approximation as possible to the world outside the classroom, in the selection both of language material and of the activities and methods used for practice in the classroom.

Implication 3:-
A communicative approach also implies a concern with behavior, with patterns of interaction as well as linguistic content. Morrrow (1981) makes a simple and useful distinction between the ‘what’- the contents of a language programme- ad the ‘how’- the ways in which that content might be learned and taught. This behavioural ‘how’ would cover the kinds of activities we carry out and the tasks we perform, such as writing a letter or an essay and etc. Recent materials have reacted in various ways to and against the communicative movement of the 1970’s. However the main principles, with varying degrees of change and modification have had a long lasting impact on materials and methods that should not be underestimated. Thomson (1996) highlighted few points regarding CLT which were:-
          I.            CLT means not teaching grammar
        II.            CLT means teaching only speaking
      III.            CLT means pair work- role play
     IV.            CLT means expecting too much from the teacher
Recent materials have reacted in various ways to and against the communicative approach of the 1970’s. However the main principles, with varying degrees of change and modification have had a lasting impact on materials and methods that should not be underestimated.  Certain criteria of CLT is too important to lose for instance the concern with the world beyond the classroom, the concern with the learner as an individual and the view of the language as structured to carry out the functions that we want to perform.

(b)   Locate principles supporting CLT within the KBSM English Language Curriculum and F1 English Language Syllabus.

Aim of KBSM English Language Curriculum:
·         The syllabus aims to extend learners’ English language proficiency in order to meet their needs to use English in certain situations in everyday life, for knowledge acquisition, and for future workplace needs.

By referring to the KBSM English Language Curriculum, there are several objectives that support the CLT that are:-
By the end of their secondary school education, learners should be able to:
·         form and maintain relationships through conversations and correspondence; take part in social interaction; and interact to obtain goods and services;
·         obtain, process and use information from various audio-visual and print sources, and present the information in spoken and written form;
·         listen to, view, read and respond to different texts, and express ideas, opinions, thoughts and feelings imaginatively and creatively in spoken and written form;

Principles that support CLT:-
(1)   form and maintain relationships through conversations and correspondence; take part in social interaction; and interact to obtain goods and services:
·         1 principle: promotes cooperative and collaborative learning
-          Through the activities that involves conversation; the students will eventually interact with each other and give opinions on the topic that is being talk about. Here, the students not only able to express their idea on certain things but they also will learn on how to give a right response. For example, in the role-playing activities where students can ask each other questions regarding certain topic (e.g. family or friend) where during this process, they will ask questions and respond politely. Moreover, through this activity the students also practice the sociolinguistic competence.In addition, the students also will collaborate with each other in order to make the process of communication of the target language can be carry out successfully. Thus, teacher needs to be the facilitator during the learning activities and promotes communication among students.
·         2 principal: practice of using the language
-          As the students get involves in the interaction process obtaining the goods and services, they will be exposed to discourse competence. Here, they will learn to start, contribute to, and end the conversation on the topic being talk about. The students will start to learn this in a consistent and coherent manner as they will take turn in order to participate in the conversation. Moreover, they also will be taught on how to ask questions and responds in a polite manner whenever they want to make enquiries.
-          Apart from that, the students also will learn the linguistic competence as they get involves in activities such as writing simple instruction or simple invitation. Here, the students usually will participate collaboratively and at the same time they will learn on how to use the simple grammar and vocabulary.
·         3 principal: focus on form
-          It is an approach to explicit grammar teaching, emphasizes a form-meaning connection and teaches grammar within the contexts and through communicative task. Thus, it is very important for the teacher to find activities that is related to their real life situation so that they will understand the context more easily. Here, teacher should encourage the students to express their idea by making the students get involve in interaction and focus more on the meaning and allow the learners to figure out the rule themselves naturally as they having a conversation with each other. During the activity, the students eventually will communicate by negotiation of meaning and gives feedback as well.

(2)   obtain, process and use information from various audio-visual and print sources, and present the information in spoken and written form:
·         1 principal: input needs to be rich
-          The activities that involve the use of authentic materials are very essential to reflect real-life situations and demands. Thus, teacher should design activities that use various audio-visual and print resources for the learning. For example by using audio-visual such as videos, the students not only will listen to the spoken texts but they also can take a look at the visuals presented in the videos.This is very good as teacher can attract the student’s interest. Moreover, teacher plays an important role in maximizing the use of the target language and this can be done through giving an instruction during the learning. Furthermore, teacher should give students greater amount of input so that they will gains greater information on the target language.
·         2 principal: input needs to be meaningful, comprehensible and elaborated.
-          The materials that are used in the activity of the learning should be meaningful and comprehensible to the students so that they can use the language in their real life. Thus, teacher needs to design activity that is authentic. For example, teacher should choose passage that is meaningful and able the students to give view on what the text is all about. Here, the process of learning can be in the form of writing or orally where here the students are encourage to elaborate their thought on what they have learn.That is why; teacher must be able to choose appropriate materials, as the proficiency levels of the students differ.

(3)   listen to, view, read and respond to different texts, and express ideas, opinions, thoughts and feelings imaginatively and creatively in spoken and written form:
·         1 principal: promotes collaborative learning
-          As the students are exposed to different texts, this can enhance their understanding on different usage of the language. The students will get involves in a group activity where they need to collaborate and interact with each other to complete their task. For example, storytelling activities during the discussion which ask the students to use their own words in order to express their ideas. Here, the process of negotiation of meaning can be seen during the discussion process.
·         2 principal: focus on fluency over accuracy
-          As the students express their own ideas, the focus will be on the fluency of the language use. Here, teacher also will emphasize the students with the discourse competence and sociolinguistic competence as the students get involves in the interaction process regarding the topic being discussed.
·         3 principal: learner-centered approach
-          Teacher should encourage the students to participate actively in an activity that use the target language which allow them to work on themselves, for example role-play activity that needs the students to cooperate with each other creatively. Thus, by conducting activity that focus on learner-centered, the students able to express their ideas and opinions freely. Moreover, in order for the learner’s linguistic knowledge to be automatic, students’ needs to be put under the real condition or situation of communication.
·         4 principal: provide error corrective feedback
-          When the students presenting their works, teachers will either give positive or negative feedback to the students. In order for teacher to make correction on the language used by the students, teacher can used direct error corrective which involved teacher’s help such as providing clues or clarification requests. In addition, error corrective and positive feedback is necessary in support of the learning process. Moreover, during the feedback, the students also will be exposed to the strategic competence that allow them to communicative effectively and repair problems caused by communication breakdown.

(d) Identify the general categories and specific items to evaluate chapters in a Malaysian English Language textbook.

Checklists are the systematic evaluation for course books. There are various checklists proposed by different authors such as Tucker (1975), Haycraft (1978), Daoud and Celce-Murcia (1979), Cunningsworth (1979, 1984) , Williams (1983), Grant (1987), Sheldon (1988), Harmer (1991), Skierso (1991) and Ur(1996). The most detailed checklist is Skeirso’s checklist.

The checklist of each and every author varies from one another from the aspect of scope, form, criteria and the terms used to describe the criteria. Almost all checklists share the similar general categories for evaluation of the chapters in course books which were design, language content, subject matter and practical considerations. Precisely, design of the course book is an important or main key for the evaluation of the textbooks which includes the layout of the materials on the page and it also involves the overall clarity of organisation whereas language content involves the coverage of linguistic items and language skills. Subject matter is related to the topic whether it is related to the theme of the course book. Last but not least, practical considerations are vital for evaluation of the course book and it can be explained as availability, durability and price. It is better if the course book is designed to be `reachable’ for all walks of people in the context of availability and price.

The specific items for the evaluation of the course book are transparency of the criteria. Transparency of the criteria can be explained as whether the concepts stated clearly and able to understand by all teachers and students with different potentials. Teachers, course designers, and materials writers must be aware that the input provided by them will possibly are processed by learners in ways different than intended. For instance, look at the words below. Can you understand these phrases? It has been used in course book.

*      Sequencing of the grammatical patterns ( appropriateness)
*      Sentence length ( matches to students proficiency of that level)
*      Spiral approach
*      Communicative activities
*      Balance in language skills
*      Usage of Authentic language
*      Encourages learners to develop their own learning strategies
*      Range of Vocabulary

The grading and sequencing of the materials is also comes under specific items for the evaluation of the course book. It can be explained in terms of the organisation of the language content. As far as we concern, language can be divided into structures. For instance, the American course book which is targeted for Upper Intermediate level seems to be easily interchanges and there seems to be no sequence. The chapter 6 of the book is entitled `Life essentials’ which talks about health problem or which is more related to healthy lifestyle however the chapter 7 is entitled as `The natural world’ which describes about remarkable places which requires travelling. It shows there is no sequencing in terms of lexical items. In contrast, Malaysian English Form 2 textbook shows correct sequence and 3 chapters clustered under one main theme, for instance `People’. The chapter 1 entitled `What people do’, the second chapter entitled as ` Villagers and their livelihood’ and followed by chapter 3 entitled as `Famous faces’. It clearly shows the lexical items are related to people and there is proper sequencing of the materials.

In addition, the presentation of the skills in the materials also has equal impact in evaluation of the course book. The course book must emphasize and integrate four skills which were speaking, reading, writing and listening. However, some course book fails to give equal importance and seem to be narrowed to focusing on writing skills only. As a teacher, we have to be aware that writing skills alone is not being used in communication. The activities of the course book must be more communicative so that it can benefit the students to improve their proficiency and boost their confidence level.



Reflection on Task week 3


Compared to the previous task, task week 3 is the most difficult one as we need to read Spada & Sauvignon’s article in order for us to locate the theory behind the CLT. At first, the question seems easy but when come to answering it, we faced with the same problem. To be exact, we did not understand the article especially Sauvignon’s article, perhaps because the language is pretty tough. However, after read it all over for so many times and refer to the other sources we managed to understand it and detect the CLT theory. Basically, we already learn about the CLT in semester 2, thus it help me to understand what is CLT is all about.

Here, CLT focus on the language learning through the real communication where it provides the students to experiment and try out the language which can be done formally or informally. In CLT, there are several components of abilities that the students need to require such as (communicative, linguistic, sociolinguistic, discourse, and strategic) competence. I still remember when I was in secondary school, my English teacher did implement this approach where she asked us to communicate with each other and does the role play activity. At first I thought that the purpose we are doing the activity is just for fun and learn something from it, but now I realize that there is another reason why we do that activity.

 Hence, through this task I am able to see clearly that CLT is being implement in the activity and the most important things is that, the way I improve myself is through the communication with my classmates. Even though, there are some grammar errors but I can speak fluently and even my teacher encourages me to speak in English with my classmates so that I am use to it. Moreover, after looking at the implication of CLT and the principles that support it within the KBSM, it becomes clearer now why CLT is being practice.  From it we are able to improve our language through communication which we deal with in our everyday life situation.

From this task, I learnt a lot about CLT and its impact toward the material development which plays a great role in the language learning. Thus, I am sure that by taking into consideration the principles of CLT, we are able to implement it in the process of learning later. Moreover, I believe that the current knowledge that I have right now can help me to understand the concept of CLT much better. Hopefully, the knowledge that I get from this task able me to create an activity that not only promotes the communicative aspect but the others abilities as well.  







No comments:

Post a Comment